C18 - Contract Law
Classifying Contracts
- contract: agreement between 2+ competent parties that can be enforced in court; legally binding agreement
- bilateral contract: agreement by both parties to do something for each other
- i.e. go to work; get paid on payday
- take a cab ride; driver expects payment
- friend sells me used DVD for $10, I agree
- friend gets $10, I get DVD
Oral Contracts and Written Contracts
- oral contract: verbal agreement between 2+ parties
- lack hard evidence / witnesses to prove contract has been made
- break golden rule of contract: “get it in writing”
- written contract: agreement between 2+ parties in which the terms are set out on paper or by Internet communication
- easier for courts to enforce
Implied Contracts and Express Contracts
- implied contract: agreement in which the parties enter a contract through their conduct
- i.e. dropping money in fare box of a bus; entered contract even though no words spoken
- contract: bus ride (service) for money
- express contract: agreement in which the terms have been discussed and agreed upon in advance
- i.e. Bob sells John his laptop
- They agree on a price and the laptop is sold
Contracts Under Seal
- contract under seal: written agreement bearing a red sticker, handwritten dot, or the word seal
- a.k.a. specialty contract, deed
- some provinces: sale / mortgage of land must be under seal to be enforceable
Elements of a Contract
consensus ad idem (meeting of the minds): a clear understanding between the parties of the terms of the contract and the willingness to abide by them
flowchart TD a[Offer] --> b[Acceptance] b --> c[Consideration] --> d[Enforceable Contract]
Offer
- offer: clear proposal to another party to enter into an agreement on certain terms
- offeror: person who makes the offer
- offeree: person who receives the offer
Making a Valid Offer
- offer must be intended seriously and its terms must be certain
- offer made as a joke / out of frustration is not valid
- i.e. I sell my chess pieces because I’m angry I got 2nd place in the chess tournament
- if reasonable person thinks offer is serious, there is likely a binding contract
Invitation to Treat
- invitation to treat: a communication intended to elicit offers from the persons who receive it
- i.e. “For Sale” sign, advertisements
- whether communication is offer or invitation to treat depends on intent of sender
- intent determined from language used and surrounding circumstances
- if someone reasonable thinks ad is offer, person may have to live up to offer
- Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company, [1893] 1 Q.B. 256 (C.A.)
Communicating an Offer
- offer is not an offer until it has been communicated to the party for whom it is intended
- offers may also be communicated via an ad
- important to know when the offeree became aware of the offer or if the offeree was even aware of the offer
Ending an Offer
- not reasonable for indefinite offer
- lapse: to be terminated or cease to exist
- offer lapses if not accepted before date set out in offer
- or if offeror dies, becomes mentally incompetent, or goes into bankruptcy
- revoke: to withdraw or take back
- offer can be revoked by offeror before it has been accepted by offeree
- counteroffer: an offer made in response to an existing offer
- i.e. I sell Toti my rare Pokémon card for $1,000
- Toti says that he wants the Pokémon card for $800 instead
Acceptance
- acceptance: clear indication by the offeree to enter into a contract on the terms set out by the offeror
- no contract w/o acceptance
- offer may state how acceptance must be made, but normally, acceptance valid if it is clear
Communication of Acceptance
Rules that govern acceptance:
- Acceptance of an offer is usually required to be active
- inaction or silence ≠ acceptance
- removes uncertainty of whether offeree has accepted
- avoids “foisting,” forming of contract w/o offeree’s consent
- i.e. company sends product to home stating that if not returned within 7 days, you would’ve purchased them
- The contract is formed when the offeror receives notice of acceptance from offeree
- Acceptance must be made in a reasonable manner, or in the form required by the offeror
- generally, acceptance communicated in same way offer was communicated
- When the offeror has expressly required acceptance by mail, or it is clear that the mail may be used … acceptance is completed as soon as the letter is mailed
- even if offeror never receives letter
- “postal acceptance” rule puts risk of losing letter on offeror
- An offer cannot be accepted if the offeree knows it has been revoked by the offeror
- unilateral contract: contract formed when the offeree accepts an offer by performing an act requested by the offeror
- i.e. finding a lost dog for $1,000 after newspaper notice for lost dog
- however, no contract formed if person finds lost dog but is unaware of newspaper notice
Consideration
- consideration: something of value that either benefits the party who receives it or is a loss / inconvenience to the party who provides it
- i.e. buying a magazine from a store: magazine (buyer’s benefit), money (seller’s benefit)
- can be anything w/ monetary value
- i.e. Rachel agrees to mow lawn if I agree to give her my Leafs tickets
- can be refraining from something you usually do
- i.e. Bob watches basketball games every Saturday but he agrees to drive me to a football game on one Saturday in exchange for my Pokémon card
Gratuitous Promise
- gratuitous promise: offer that gives benefit to offeree only
- non-enforceable contract in Court most of the time
- exceptions
- Eli makes generous pledge to hospital’s building fund
- hospital begins renovations from pledge
- if Eli refuses to honour pledge after renovations,…
- Court may enforce contract (constitutes consideration)
Valid Consideration
- present consideration: something of value that is exchange at the time a contract is formed
- future consideration: something of value that is exchanged after a contract is formed
- i.e. delivering goods / services to my home
Invalid Consideration
past consideration: benefit conferred before contract has / is alleged to have been formed
i.e. you help someone, they promise you money after your help, they don’t pay
Invalidating Factors
Incapacity to Contract
capacity: the ability to enter into and understand a legally binding contract
Minors
Most contracts with minors are unenforceable in court
- Enforceable Contracts
- minors bound by contracts for purchase of necesaries
- necessaries: basic items a person requires to function in society, such as food, clothing, shelter, and medical / dental services
- minor only obligated to pay fair and reasonable price for goods or services
- must be beneficial to minor and cannot be disadvantage
- Voidable Contracts
- voidable contract: a contract that can be avoided / not carried out
- until minor leaves contract, adult who agreed is bound by it
- ratification: indication of willingness to be bound by a contract after reaching age of majority
- i.e. Leslie, a minor, purchases motorcycle for 100
- She can stop making payments and return motorcycle at any time as long as she’s a minor
- After turning 18, she is now bound by the contract
- repudiation: indication by words / conduct that one does not intend to honour the obligations of a contract
- for contracts that are binding unless minor repudiates them upon reaching age of majority
- Void Contracts
- void contracts: agreements without legal force
- i.e. youth unknowingly sells valuable baseball card to adult
- Courts can force the adult to return baseball card
- Parental Liability
- parents not liable for their children failing to pay for goods not considered necessities
- most merchants don’t make deals w/ minors unless parent / guardian willing to co-sign contract
- agreement that parent / guardian agrees to fulfill minor’s obligation to pay if minor doesn’t
Incapacitated Persons
- People incapacitated bcz. of mental incompetence do not have capacity to contract
- Law assumes such individuals cannot understand terms of a contract
- no meeting of minds
- Contract for necessaries enforceable but only if at reasonable price
- Contract involving non-necessaries voidable by incapacitated party if other party knew / should’ve known about incapacity
- Contracts made by intoxicated persons voidable if such persons can prove they were so impaired they didn’t understand what was going on
- Must void contract within reasonable period
Illegality
- enforceable contract must be formed for a legal purpose
- legal purpose: purpose not forbidden by law
- contracts for illegal purpose are VOID
- i.e. agreeing to mow the lawn for Top Quality Tiger Cocaine
- contracts to commit torts illegal
- rescission: restoring parties to the positions they would’ve occupied had there been no contract
- what Courts do if a contract is void normally
- does not happen for illegal contracts
- Courts only help if one party was innocent and unaware of illegal act
Contrary to Public Policy
contrary to public policy: against the morals and ethics of a community / society
Result: rescission unless nature of contract is offensive
Contracts Contrary to Public Policy | Example |
---|---|
Contracts interfering with the administration of justice | • paying a witness to testify |
Contracts that unduly restrain trade | • making it a condition of sale of a business that the purchaser never open a similar business anywhere |
Contracts that restrict competition | • agreements among merchants to sell product at certain price • mergers among companies that would reduce competition |
Contracts that are bets or wagers | • gambling and betting outside provincially licensed facilities (gambling debts in legal place enforceable) |
Contracts injurious to the state | • paying a member of the provincial legislature to vote for / against a bill |
Mistake
- mistake: an error about an important term of a contract
- common mistake: both parties make the same mistake
- i.e. Connie’s record collection destroyed in fire while she and store owner making a deal
- contract void bcz. both parties thought that Connie still had record to sell
- mutual mistake: both parties are mistaken but they make different mistakes
- i.e. Connie’s records are 78s and she thinks store sells 78s;
- store owner thinks records are LPs and his store sells only LPs
- Court rules in favour of most reasonable position
- contract void where both positions equally reasonable
- unilateral mistake: one party is mistaken and the other party knows it
- i.e. Connie tells store owner that she is selling everything but her Elvis Presley collection
- Store owner sees a rare Elvis record, says nothing, and takes it
- Connie later notices record is missing, but owner refuses to return it, saying “a bargain is a bargain”
- Court would not allow store owner to keep Elvis record
- clerical mistake: error made in recording the details of a contract
- i.e. 10,000
- non est factum: Latin for “it is not my deed”; defence to void a contract
- more common when fewer people could read
- now restricted only to occurrences of fraud or misrepresentation
- neglection to read not enforceable
Misrepresentation
- misrepresentation: false or inaccurate statement of fact that causes the other party to enter into a contract
- caveat emptor: Latin for “let the buyer beware”, implying that a purchase is made at the buyer’s risk
- i.e. Asif knows that a mall going to be built on vacant land across street when he puts house up on sale
- Asif under no obligation to share this info.
- misrepresentation when Asif lies about the info. or doesn’t share it when asked about it
Innocent Misrepresentation
- innocent misrepresentation: false statement that is honestly believed to be true by the other party
- contract voidable on victim’s option
- depends on whether terms of contract have been executed (carried out)
- if not, Court is more willing to set contract aside
- if executed, it will be set aside only if what was received is so diff. from what was supposed to be received…
- … that it amounts to a failure of consideration
- i.e. inexperienced clerk tells Jake that his new lawn mower will never need to have its blades sharpened
- contract executed? unlikely to have contract set aside but damages can be paid if misrepr. became term of contract
Fraudulent Misrepresentation
- fraudulent misrepresentation: statement that the maker knows is false, made with the intent to cause another party to act on the statement
- i.e. salesperson sells Mark a used car that has been in an accident even though Mark states he wants a car that had not been in an accident
Duress
- duress: use of unlawful threats or pressure to force someone into a contract
- ways of duress
- threats of physical harm to person or his/her family
- threats to someone’s property
- threats of imprisonment
- financial threats
- threats to reveal information that would be embarrassing / scandalous to person
Undue Influence
- undue influence: pressure arising from a special relationship between parties that create power imbalance, making it impossible for subordinate / less powerful party to freely give consent
- in Court, must demonstrate that subordinate party was coerced into agreeing
- generally involves unequal bargaining position
- i.e. nephew was his elderly aunt’s caregiver
- he completely dominated her actions
- induces her to sell him all of her property at very low price
- situations involving undue influence (always)
- lawyer contracting w/ client
- doctor contracting w/ patient
- parent contracting w/ minor child
- adult contracting w/ senile parent
Unconscionability
- unconscionability: unreasonable advantage taken of one of the parties to a contract
- Courts generally reluctant w/ contract on basis that bargain is unfair
- intervene in extreme cases, like this one
- i.e. Larry trying to sell snowmobile worth 1,100 to make mortgage payment
- Bonnie offer $1,100 bcz. he knows Larry needs the money
Carrying Out the Contract
privity of contract: only the parties to the contract enforce the rights and obligations created by the contract
Discharging a Contract
- discharged contract = contract brought to end = parties no longer bound by any obligations within it
Ways to Discharge Contract
Method of Discharge | Definition | Example | Court Involvement |
---|---|---|---|
Performance | Completion of obligations under contract | Tom contracts Bob to roof his house; Bob roofs the house | Courts not invovled |
Substantial performance | Carrying out essential elements of contract | Shell orders 500 barrels of oil from Alberta Petrol, but only 499 delivered | Courts may be involved in order to determine if contract substantially performed |
Discharge by agreement | Parties to contract agree to end contract | Pulp mill needs more lumber that originally contracted for, it agreees w/ logging company for new contract for more lumber | Courts not involved |
Discharge by frustration | Parties to a contract cannot carry out terms of agreement bcz. events beyond parties’ control prevent them from doing so | Dan signed a contract with Bogie Lake Golf Club for the annual O’Malley Invitational Tournament for 100 golfers. Severe thunderstorm prevents play on the day. | Parties to contract cannot sue for breach as long as any money paid and any goods provided returned |
Breach of Contract
- breach of contract: failure by a party to perform the obligations agreed to in the contract
- does not necessarily terminate contract
- some cases, party released from contractual obligations
- some cases, party who has not received may have to continue performing obligations and can only sue for damages
- specific performance: court order requiring a party to fulfill the terms of a contract
Breach of Condition
- condition: a very important term of a contract
- condition not fulfilled → failure of consideration
- breach of condition means repudiation of contract
- i.e. I ordered a truck but got a van. I don’t have to pay.
Breach of Warranty
- warranty: minor term of a contract
- i.e. Madeline contracted to paint Elissa’s dining room
- terms of contract = paint splatters removed from windows after painting done
- job done beautifully but paint splatters not removed
- Elissa has to pay Madeline
- She can deduct payment to pay someone else to remove paint splatters
- exemption clause: clauses that release a party from liability
Remedies for Breach of Contract
- damages: money awarded by the Court for actual losses resulting from a breach of contract
- i.e. Madeline agreed to paint Elissa’s tool shed and neglected to paint trim
- Elissa could sue for damages amounting to cost of having job completed
- court would only reward Elissa w/ money lost from damage
- mitigation of damages: obligation on part of the injured party to attempt to minimize losses suffered
- injured party must attempt to lose less when contract breached
- injunction: court order requiring a party to do something or prohibiting an action
- i.e. force a shipping company to deliver my package after neglect
The Sale of Goods
- Sales of Goods Acts
- “goods:” personal property such as TVs, books, and furniture
- do not cover sale of land
- do not cover services such as banking
Title and Risk
- agreement to sell: agreement where the title to the goods is transferred to the buyer in the future
- Rules of who suffers losses if goods damaged / destroyed
- Rule 1: When item to be purchased is available in the store, title passes to buyer as soon as contract is made
- even if you go to pick up bought product next day and it is destroyed
- unconditional sale of specific goods in a deliverable state
- can be changed to make store agree to be responsible until product picked up
- Rule 2: If the seller has to do something to specific goods to put them in deliverable state, then title does not pass until changes have been made and purchaser notified
- Rule 3: On certain occasions, title passes only after there has been some type of evaluation of the goods (i.e. weighing, measuring, testing)
- Rule 4: Sometimes the buyer may take goods away in order to test them. Title automatically passes to buyer if buyer neglects to return goods / pay for goods.
- Rule 5: In some cases, goods being contracted for have not yet been manufactured or are an unspecified part of a large amount
- i.e. order of new car at dealership not built yet
- title passes to buyer once
- a) car had been manufactured
- b) the dealer advised buyer that car was ready
- c) buyer accepts car
- Rule 1: When item to be purchased is available in the store, title passes to buyer as soon as contract is made
Standardized Terms
- c.i.f.: “cost, insurance, and freight”
- title passes to buyer early
- seller accepts responsibility to pay cost of transporting and insuring goods until arrival
- f.o.b.: “free on board”
- seller bears risk until…
- goods placed on board carrier chosen by buyer
- c.o.d.: “cash on delivery”
- seller maintains title and control
- …until goods delivered to buyer and paid for
Manufacturer’s Warranties
- manufacturer’s warranty: promise from manufacturer to repair its product without cost to the purchaser within specified period
- manufacturer responsible for replacing any defective parts only for specified length of time
- “warranty card” outlines conditions of warranty (comes w/ item at time of purchase)
Implied Conditions and Warranties
- implied conditions: essential elements of a contract that are not specifically stated in contract
- implied in Sale of Goods Act
Implied Conditon | Example |
---|---|
The seller has the right to sell the goods | If the seller does not have this goods, the rightful owner can take them back |
The goods must be of a merchantable quality | If you purchase a gas BBQ, it mush be in good working order and capable of cooking food |
The goods must be fit for a particular purpose | If you tell a store clerk you need rope for lifting your boat out of the water, the rope the store sells you must be strong enough to do the job. |
The goods must comply with their description | If you see a white couch in a store but order it in a different colour, you must receive the identical model in the chosen colour |
Goods sold by sample must comply with the sample | If your hockey team purchases uniforms based on sample provided by seller, the goods you receive must be of the same quality and materials as the sample. |
Remedies for Breach of Sale of Goods
Buyer’s Remedies
- default: failure to do something required by law
- if seller defaults on contract,…
- if seller misrepresents product, contract may be rescinded
- damages can be awarded if misrepresentation negligent or fraudulent
- if seller breaches a condition, contract may be rescinded or goods can be rejected by buyer
- buyer can alternative demand money paid to be returned
- if there is a breach of warranty by seller, buyer can use breach as valid reason not to pay all or part of purchase price
- buyer can sue for damages if buyer suffers damages exceeding price
Seller’s Remedies
- if goods have not been delivered, seller may exercise their lien against goods
- lien: the right to hold / dispose of another person’s property in payment for a debt (owed money for good)
- if goods are being transported to an insolvent buyer, seller may exercise right of stoppage in transit
- insolvent buyer: buyer unable to pay
- stoppage in transit: returning goods to a seller before they have been delivered to a buyer
- seller may reseller the goods
- after notifying buyer and providing adequate time to make payment
- if goods are perishable, seller need not delay sale bcz. produce may spoil
Protection for Consumers
Federal Consumer Law
- Competition Act deals w/ dishonest business practices and misleading advertising
- bait and switch: advertising an item at a low price and maintaining a small amount of stock in hopes of luring consumers to purchase higher-priced goods
- illegal under Competition Act
- penalty: fine, jail, both
- does not offer any form of compensation for the consumer (civil court)
Provincial Consumer Law
Door-to-Door Selling
- Consumer Protection Act or Direct Sellers Act
- The buyer has a right to cancel the contract for a period of 10 days after receiving the written copy of the contract
- “cooling-off period”
- allows buyer to consider whether they actually want to purchase, w/o sales pressure
- The buyer may cancel the contract within the ten-day period by giving proper notice to the seller
- in person, by mail, or other forms in Act
- buyer must retain proof of cancellation
- The cancellation has the effect of rescinding the contract
- return to original state
- money returned to buyer, goods returned to seller
Buying on Credit
- “buying on credit”: purchase via loan or instalments (w/ interest charges)
- hidden costs
- prov. passed laws requiring contracts to set out
- annual interest rate charged; and
- cost of borrowing the money
Property Situated on a Reserve
S. 89 (1) of Indian Act — restriction on mortgage, seizure and so on, of property on a reserve by non-First Nations peoples
89 (1) Subject to this Act, the real and personal property of an Indian or a band situated on a reserve is not subject to charge, pledge, mortgage, attachment, levy, seizure, distress or execution in favour or at the instance of any person other than an Indian or a band.
- in case of non-payment, non-First-Nations seller cannot seek lien against property or seize such property
- First Nations ppl. and bands may have trouble purchasing goods on credit (too risky for lender)
- s. 89 (2) of Indian Act provides that where seller maintains right to property or right of posession,…
- seller may exercise rights set out in contract
- sellers should ensure title to goods remains w/ seller until buyer pays
- or sale takes place on condition that asset can be repossessed for non-payment